Back

A/B Testing Is Easy. Building an Experimentation Culture Is Not.

January 6, 2026
A/B testing is everywhere—but true experimentation maturity is rare. This post explores the difference between running tests and building an experimentation culture using Webflow Optimize.

Most agencies will tell you they can run A/B tests.

Some of them are very good at it.

But running experiments and building the ability to experiment well over time are two very different things—and if you don’t understand the difference, you’ll feel it six months after launch.

At Two Impress, we’ve seen this play out again and again. Teams invest in optimization tooling, launch a few tests, get mixed results, and slowly lose momentum. Not because the tool didn’t work—but because experimentation was treated as a service, not a capability.

This post is about that gap.

The Two Paths of Optimization

When companies come to us asking about A/B testing, personalization, or optimization, they’re usually standing at a fork in the road—even if they don’t realize it yet.

Path One: “Just do it for us”

This is the most common approach.

You hire an agency.
They design hypotheses.
They build variants.
They run the tests.
They send reports.

It’s fast.
It’s efficient.
And for many teams, it’s the right place to start.

But it has a ceiling.

When optimization lives entirely outside your organization, your internal team doesn’t develop the muscle memory required to:

  • Form strong hypotheses
  • Understand statistical confidence
  • Avoid false positives
  • Learn from losing tests
  • Apply insights across channels

When the engagement ends, experimentation often ends with it.

Path Two: Enablement (and why it’s harder)

Enablement is slower at first—but more durable.

Instead of acting as a black box, the agency works with your team:

  • Explaining why a test exists, not just what it does
  • Teaching how to interpret results, not just reporting lift
  • Helping teams understand when not to test
  • Creating internal confidence and ownership

The goal isn’t dependency.
The goal is capability.

This path requires more patience, more transparency, and more trust—but it’s how experimentation becomes part of how your organization thinks, not just what it occasionally buys.

Where Most Agencies Choose a Side

Here’s the honest truth most agencies won’t say out loud:

  • CRO agencies are optimized for execution
  • Training companies are optimized for education
  • Very few are built to do both well

Execution-first agencies often struggle with enablement because:

  • Teaching slows delivery
  • Transparency reduces perceived “magic”
  • Empowered clients don’t outsource forever

Enablement-only partners, on the other hand, may leave teams overwhelmed without hands-on support when things get real.

So most agencies pick a lane.

We didn’t.

Why Two Impress Chose Both

At Two Impress, we believe clients shouldn’t have to choose between:

  • Getting results now
    and
  • Building internal capability for later

We intentionally designed our optimization services to support both execution and enablement, because enterprise teams are not static. They evolve.

Some teams want:

  • Fully managed experimentation while they build confidence

Others want:

  • Coaching and guardrails while they take the wheel

Most want:

  • A blend that changes over time
So that’s how we work.

What “Enablement” Actually Means (In Practice)

Enablement is not a workshop.
It’s not documentation.
It’s not a one-time training.

In real engagements, enablement looks like:

  • Running experiments together, not behind the scenes
  • Explaining how hypotheses are formed
  • Teaching teams how to evaluate test quality, not just outcomes
  • Helping internal stakeholders understand why a test failed—and why that’s valuable
  • Gradually transferring ownership as confidence increases
  • Remaining available as a strategic backstop, not a bottleneck

The end goal isn’t to make ourselves indispensable.

The end goal is to make experimentation sustainable.

Execution Still Matters (And We Do That Too)

None of this diminishes the importance of execution.

Strong experimentation still requires:

  • Clean implementation
  • Proper audience segmentation
  • Thoughtful personalization logic
  • Reliable analytics
  • Disciplined iteration
We do all of that.

But we don’t believe execution and enablement are mutually exclusive. In fact, we believe the strongest optimization programs require both.

Why This Matters More with Webflow Optimize

Tools like Webflow Optimize lower the barrier to experimentation—but they don’t remove the responsibility.

The tool can:

  • Make testing faster
  • Reduce technical friction
  • Surface insights more quickly

What it cannot do is:

  • Teach your team how to think experimentally
  • Prevent bad tests from producing misleading results
  • Create alignment across marketing, product, and leadership

That’s where enablement changes outcomes.

Choosing the Right Model for Your Team

Here’s the question we encourage every client to ask themselves:

Do we want optimization done for us, or do we want optimization to become something we own?

There’s no wrong answer.

What matters is that you know the difference—and that you don’t have to change agencies when your answer changes.

The Bottom Line

Two Impress isn’t just an A/B testing agency.
We’re not just an enablement partner either.

We’re built for organizations that want:

  • Real experimentation
  • Real learning
  • Real ownership
  • And real results

Whether you need someone to run experiments for you, help you learn how to run them yourself, or guide you through both—we believe you should be able to choose without starting over somewhere else.

That’s the difference.

News & Insights
September 22, 2025
News
Is Webflow Optimize worth it?